Earlier this week I went to a contemporary dance show at the Alexandria
Library. It was a group from Cairo and very different from any performances I
had seen yet in Egypt. I enjoyed the entire show, but there was one dance in
particular that resonated powerfully with my experiences abroad. The number
featured a large tank of water and completely submerged in the tank sat a
cross-legged dancer. He breathed through a tube, motionlessly staring straight
ahead. The water was still and beautiful, bending the murky stage light and
throwing it back out into the audience. A second dancer was moving outside of
the tank, and one of his first gestureswas to pull the breathing tube away from
the man in the water. As the water dancer writhed about in confusion, searching
for air, the second man glided around the tank, peering into its depths.The water
itself erupted with waves and bubbles, instantly unrecognizable from the
stillness moments prior.
The water dancer became more and more desperate, slamming his body into the
side of the tank in an attempt to reach the air that the second dancer was
breathing. He at last found the surface, but was confused by the sensation of the
exposure and continued to thrash about in the water alternately surfacing for
the necessary air. The air dancer meanwhile had been venturing closer and
closer to the water’s surface and finally attempted to submerge his head, only
to come up seconds later coughing and sputtering. As the dance progressed the
air dancer climbed onto the edge of the tank and lowered himself cautiously
into the water, shivering with the change temperature. The two moved around in
the water, in a confused battle-like dance, until the air dancer pulled himself
from the tank and returned to the ground. Back on firm land, however, he slid
and slipped on the wet floor, unable to balance on the water that had
infiltrated his environment. Eventually he returned to the water, whereupon the
two dancers emerged together. The water dancer clung to the back of the air
dancer, terrified at first to touch the stage, but eventually lowered himself,
and the two glided around the wet stage, balancing themselves with the side of
the tank.
I found the dance reminiscent not only of my semester in Egypt, but also of
my time spent in Kenya before college. I’m sure the dance could be applied to
many of the thousands of traditional cultures that have faced Western
infiltration. Of course, this is a very romanticized analogy. I don’t by any
means think that all traditional cultures of the past were beautiful, isolated
pockets of harmony. The splendor of still water in the dance represented the
power and order of tradition. The water dancer sat motionlessly staring
straight ahead, content in his world, because he had no other options. His
needs were met so variation was not necessary. Before globalization and
awareness of faraway cultures, tradition ran day to day life in many parts of
the world. Cultures mixed and influenced one another, but not on the level that
the West is currently permeating traditional lifestyles around the globe. When
colonists ripped the breathing tube out of much of Africa and South America,
the people in those areas were forever robbed of the ability to breath under
water. As that first TV in every village conveys the amenities and glamour of
the West, the viewers will likely want to breathe that same air.
The Westerner, attempting to curiously venture into the unknown, receives
quite a shock to the system as well. Study all the theory you want, but you
can’t learn how to swim from a book. You’ll study the physics of each movement
and then you’ll jump into the water and try to breath. You’ll be so overwhelmed
by the foreign, fluidity of the water that you’ll forget all you read and you’ll
drown. You can’t possibly understand a foreign culture until you experience it
firsthand and chances are you won’t fully understand it even then.To come at
all close to comprehending another culture, requires stepping out of your
comfort zone and fully submerging yourself. If you try to stick your head in
the water while keeping your feet firmly planted on the ground you will come
out with a chaotic and muddled experience. It is only when you let go of all of
your precious assumptions and suppositions that you might begin to see.Truly
seeing involves respecting that which you observe, which in turn requires the humility
to look outside of yourself. It is too easy to see things for what we want them
to be or what we think they should be—or to see things for what they are not. Seeing
takes a radical acceptance that other people might not share your deepest
values.
As I have expressed in earlier blog posts, variance in value-sets has been
one of the most emotionally wearing challenges I have faced during my time in
Egypt. For much of the time I have struggled with gender politics and religion
and last night I had my first serious discussion with Egyptians on the topic of
Israel. While I had skirted the topic with some of the Americans on my program,
I had previously been doing my utmost to avoid it. It is one of the most
complicated debates in existence and I honestly don’t know what I feel about
it. Last night however, one of the Egyptians in my dorm commented that Gaza is
not so different from the Holocaust and my dam broke. This was the second time
I had heard this claim made in two days and I couldn’t help but respond.
Of course responding only led to a fruitless argument that left a heavy
damper in the air. Many of the Egyptians (including the woman with whom I was
discussing) have lost family members in Gaza. I know Israelis who have lost
family members as well, but when you compare it just comes down to a tat for
tat of emotional losses from two groups of extremely similar people. I think
the most important distinctions are that are too often ignored are those
between Hamas and the Palestinian people and between the Israel government and
the Israeli people.
I’m getting sidetracked though. I really had no intention of bringing up
Israeli-Palestinian politics at all. The point I originally hoped to make was
that sometimes people’s beliefs are so deeply engrained that they cannot be
shaken. And sometimes those beliefs are the exact opposite from those of
someone with equally steadfastprinciples. That does not mean, however, that
those people shouldn’t talk or that they can’t form relationships. One my best
friends in high school and someone I still highly respect today could not have ranged
farther from me on the political spectrum, but she is incredibly smart and fun
to be around. So many different factors weave together to make up person’s
beliefs, but those views don’t define the person. Aside from political and
religious outlooks and separate from national and sexual orientation, a person
has her preferences in sports and art. People have hobbies and senses of humor.
There are food preferences and clothingpreferences. You can completely disagree
with someone’s viewpoint on one topic and still find a great deal in common
with her.
Rather than focusing on changing the differences, why not focus on the
similarities that do exist? Judaism and Islam have more in common than in
variance. I find it highly ironic that the two groups are fighting over a piece
of land for religious reasons in the first place. And for the differences that
do exist, why can we not celebrate them? A person learns most from things that
are new and diverse. Differentiation is what opens a person’s perspective. I
can’t imagine how blinded my views would be if I hadn’t had conservative
friends in high school pushing me to explain why exactly I encompassed those
views. There is a definite melancholy in the idea of cultures around the world losing
their individuality. But there is also a beauty in the mixing of peoples and
the sharing of ideas and traditions. The key component in that beauty, however,
is that there is equal sharing and not an imposition of beliefs from one side. As Western culture spreads across the
world it is the responsibility of Westerners to become educated and cultured. This
does mean touristy safaris and cruises or reading National Geographic. This
means talking to people and openly listening to outside perspectives
Listening without imposing can be far more challenging than one would
think. It is one thing for me to accept that people have differing views on the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict. But it is more difficult to accept that people
might have differing views on women’s and gay rights or domestic violence. I
see these differences I am not sure that it is morally acceptable for me to sit
back and observe a culture or to take part in a culture that promotes these practices.
I have realized though, that all of these issues are far more intricate and
multi-faceted than I can comprehend. Women wear the Hijaab and the Nicab, for
example, for all sorts of reasons. Some might feel outside pressure to wear it,
but for me to assert that all women are forced and that the Hijaab is sexist
would be vast simplification on the complexity of the tradition. I have my
values and I don’t need to bend them, but I also must remember that none of us
have the answer in life. Maybe there is a greater power out there who knows
what truly is right and wrong, but as far as I’m concerned no one here on earth
has access to that scripture.
Had I come into Egypt raging for women’s rights and the abolishment of
religious law, I would have first been vastly disliked, second sorely
disappointed, and third incredibly naïve. I would have missed out on the
opportunity to understand why people here do what they do. I would not have had
my eyes opened to the number of challenges and hypocrisies that America still
comprises. It would have been like trying to breath in a tank of water and I
would have choked. Then I would have left in frustration, returning to the
country I thought had all the answers only to find that it had been dampened by
what I had seen outside. All I can do as a foreigner—and all I ever really
should do anywhere I go is present myself for who I am. Then others around me
can choose whether or not my traditions and values are worthy of replicating.
I feel like this blog post came off a bit idealistic with my vague and
flowery approaches, but before you disregard it just take a moment and think it
through. Then take a look at how things are playing out in the world today and
let me know if you have any better solutions. Really, tell me—I want to hear.
Because the way I see it, Westernization is currently being met with
anti-American sentiments and resistance efforts that are almost leading to more
othering and stereotyping than existed prior to globalization. The only
solution I see is for people to mix at the civilian level and listen to one
another. Groups like Encounter (an organization that brings together
Palestinian and Israeli teens for intercultural dialogue) are a wonderful start
and should be replicated. It is only once we can learn to celebrate differences
and learn how to truly listen that we will ever come close to peace in the
Middle East and in our own lives, but that really is not so hard when you get
down to it.